What we have is silos, competing facts and realities. I think we need more critical debate so we dig deeper into the issues and understand where perhaps authors may be leading us astray.

For example, you are very pro EV, whereas an author like "B" has a very different perspective. Both of you seem to be following logic, trends and science.

For a start, why not pull apart this article and tell us what is wrong in the authors position:
https://thehonestsorcerer.medium.com/right-for-the-wrong-reasons-66f122923012